DevOps & Security

Every crash grouped, deduped
and assigned to the right person

An error tracker like Sentry catches every exception, but a busy app still produces hundreds of entries a week. Many are the same underlying bug, reported a dozen different ways, and sorting that out falls on whoever has time. We build an agent that groups exceptions by root cause, dedupes the noise, and assigns each real issue to the engineer whose code touched it last.

from$800
Timeline5 to 10 days
What is includedExceptions grouped by actual root cause, not just matching stack trace textDuplicate and recurring crash detection across releasesAutomatic assignment to the engineer whose recent commit touched the failing codeSeverity scoring based on user impact, not just error countPlain-language summary of what broke and the likely cause attached to every ticket
60-80%reduction in duplicate tickets created from the same underlying bug (typical range)
correct engineerassigned on first pass for most issues, based on recent commit history to the failing code
<10 mintypical time from a new exception appearing to a triaged, assigned ticket

Why your backlog looks bigger than it is

An error tracker generates a steady stream of exceptions from a live application. A meaningful share of them are the same bug, reported through slightly different stack traces. A null check missing in three call sites can all hit the same underlying issue. The same crash can recur every time one edge case comes up. Without active grouping, these show up as separate issues. The backlog inflates, and it gets hard to tell a genuinely new problem from the old one counted five times.

Assignment is its own headache. Someone has to look at each new issue and guess roughly what broke and who last touched that code. Then they assign it, or it sits in an unowned backlog. On a team without a dedicated triage rotation, that someone is usually whoever happened to open the error tracker that day. Triage quality ends up depending on who was paying attention.

Severity gets judged by raw error count too often. A low-impact exception can fire a thousand times an hour, a background job retry. It still outranks a rare but serious bug that only a handful of real customers hit. The numbers just look bigger.

What the agent sorts out

The agent reads every exception as it arrives in your error tracker. It groups each one with others sharing the same actual root cause, not just similar-looking stack trace text. It also flags recurring crashes, the ones that keep showing up release after release despite looking fixed on paper. Each distinct issue gets a severity score based on estimated user impact. How many distinct users hit it, and whether it sits in a critical path like checkout or login, matters more than the raw count.

For assignment, the agent checks the git history of the failing file and function and assigns the issue to whoever committed there most recently. A documented fallback goes to a team default when there is no clear single owner. Every assigned ticket carries a plain-language summary of what broke and the likely cause, based on the stack trace and recent changes. It also links to the specific commits involved, so the engineer picking it up starts with context, not a raw stack trace.

Known issues already being tracked are suppressed from re-alerting. A weekly rollup shows what is new, what is recurring and what got resolved. Typical integrations: Sentry, Bugsnag or Rollbar for the error data, GitHub or GitLab for commit history, and Jira, Linear or GitHub Issues for the resulting tickets.

What engineers still decide

Deciding how to actually fix a bug stays an engineering decision, and so does deciding that an issue is not worth fixing right now. Resolving or dismissing a ticket is always done by the assigned person or a lead. The agent never closes something automatically just because it stopped recurring for a few days. When ownership is genuinely unclear, which happens when a bug spans the boundary between two services, a person resolves it. The agent’s commit-history evidence is a starting point, not a final verdict.

What never happens automatically

Every grouping decision and every assignment is logged with its reasoning, so a wrongly grouped or wrongly assigned issue is easy to spot and correct. That correction feeds back into how similar cases get handled later. The agent never auto-resolves or auto-dismisses a ticket. It only groups, scores and assigns. A kill switch reverts to your error tracker’s default, ungrouped view at any time, without losing the issue history already triaged.

Price and timeline

Option Price What it covers Timeline
Single automation from $800 One application, one error tracker, grouping, severity scoring, assignment 5 to 10 days
Department package from $2,300 Exception triage plus performance regression alerts and post-release smoke tests 2 to 4 weeks

Running cost is usually $20 to $60 a month in model usage depending on exception volume.

This pairs well with performance regression alerts for the slow-but-not-crashing side of the same codebase. It also pairs with the existing log triage automation, for the active-incident, raw-log side of error handling. For the deploy that likely introduced a new crash, see automated deployments with rollback.

Full package details are on the AI agents service page and the automation-everything overview. For how we handle error volume on our own products, see the ProBay AI agent team case study, a marketplace we are launching. The secure infrastructure case study covers a related setup.

Backlog full of exceptions nobody has sorted through? Get in touch and we will connect it to your error tracker.

Tired of doing this by hand? We can take the whole routine off your team, not only this step: Routine takeover, from $400 →

FAQ

How is this different from the log triage automation in your catalogue?

Log triage reads raw production logs and pages someone during an active incident. This works inside your error tracker, Sentry, Bugsnag or similar. It groups and assigns application exceptions day to day, incident or not, so bugs get fixed before they become one.

How much does exception triage automation cost?

From $800 for one application connected to one error tracker, live in 5 to 10 days. Multiple services or a larger engineering team usually run $1,500 to $2,500.

How does it know who to assign a bug to?

It checks git blame and recent commit history for the failing file and function, and assigns to whoever touched that code most recently. There is a fallback to a team-level default when no clear owner exists.

Will it close or dismiss bugs on its own?

No. It groups, dedupes, scores severity and assigns. Resolving or dismissing an issue is always a decision the assigned engineer or a lead makes.

Which error trackers does it work with?

Sentry, Bugsnag and Rollbar directly, or any error tracker with an API. It connects to your existing ticketing system too: Jira, Linear or GitHub Issues.

Start here

Tell us the problem.
We bring the system.

A 30-minute call, then a written plan with numbers within 48 hours. No obligation. If we are not the right fit, we will say so and point you to someone who is.

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?

This site is our work.
Want one like it?

Ten languages, no page builder, launched in 2026 by a team working since 2015. We can build the same quality into your site.

  • 10 languages
  • Since 2015
Get a site like this →