AI search optimisation:
getting cited, not just ranked
A growing share of research now happens inside ChatGPT, Perplexity or an AI Overview, not a list of blue links. Ranking well in traditional search does not automatically mean getting cited there. We structure content so a model can extract it cleanly, check that it can even access your site, and track whether you actually get cited.
Why ranking well is not enough anymore
A site can rank well in traditional Google results and still be invisible in an AI Overview or a ChatGPT answer. Usually it is one of two reasons. The site’s robots.txt or firewall quietly blocks the crawlers these systems use. Or the content buries the actual answer in the middle of a long paragraph instead of stating it directly, which makes it hard for a model to extract. Nobody notices this gap, because most teams do not yet have a dashboard for AI citation the way they check Search Console for rankings.
One cause is especially easy to miss. A security or bot-mitigation rule added for an unrelated reason, like blocking scraper abuse, can silently block the exact crawlers these answer engines use. No amount of content restructuring helps until that access is restored.
What the work actually covers
We check the boring but critical thing first: can known AI crawlers actually reach your site, or is a security rule silently blocking them. Then we restructure priority content into clear, directly quotable statements, lists and FAQ blocks. This is the format these systems extract most reliably, without turning the page into a bulleted mess for human readers. We set a citation baseline by checking what ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google’s AI Overview currently say about your category, then track it monthly.
We also track what a competitor gets cited for instead of you, on the same question. That gap is usually the clearest signal of what your own content is missing. It beats a generic best-practices checklist with no reference to what is actually winning the citation right now.
What you hand us to start
A list of the pages or topics you most want cited for. Ideally, server log access, so we can check for known AI crawler user agents being blocked, which happens more often than you would expect. If your team has noticed questions where a model gives an outdated or wrong answer about your product, send those over. They are often the fastest, most concrete starting point.
What the monthly check actually tracks
Citation appearance across the answer engines we track, for your category’s key questions. Crawler access logs for known AI bots. And, where attributable, referral traffic from AI answer engines that include a link. We log the exact question asked and the exact answer returned at each check, not just a yes or no citation count. The wording of the answer often reveals exactly what gap needs fixing next. We keep it as a running record, so a shift in how a model answers is visible over time, not anecdotal.
Price and timeline
| Option | Price | What it covers | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch or audit | from $700 | Crawler access audit, content restructure, citation baseline | 1 to 2 weeks |
| Monthly management | from $500 / month | Monthly citation tracking, ongoing content structure optimisation | monthly, no lock-in |
| Full control, handover to your team | from $1,700 | Full audit and fixes, plus a tracking process documented for your own team | 2 weeks |
Related
This service stays deliberately narrow, around access and structure, rather than promising to game an opaque, fast-changing system. That is also why it pairs naturally with ordinary on-page and content work. The clarity that earns a citation from a model is, almost always, the same clarity that earns a better ranking in traditional search and a better reader experience. Correct schema markup is a frequent prerequisite too, since structured data is one of the clearest signals a model can extract. This sits naturally beside SaaS SEO and content hubs and topic clusters, since clear, well-structured content serves both channels at once. Full service: SEO and content. For the AI agent side of our work, see the AI agents service. This structure is the same one behind our 973-page SEO site. Get in touch and we will check right now whether AI crawlers can even reach your site.
FAQ
How much does AI search optimisation cost?
From $700 for an access and structure audit on your priority pages, with monthly citation tracking and ongoing optimisation from $500 a month.
Can you guarantee we get cited by ChatGPT?
No, and anyone who guarantees that is not being straight with you. These systems change constantly and citation behaviour is not fully public. We optimise what is known to help, crawlability, clear structure, quotable statements, and report honestly on what we see.
Is this different from regular SEO?
Related but distinct. Traditional SEO optimises for ranking in a list of links. This also accounts for how a model extracts and summarises content, which rewards clarity over keyword density.
How long until we see citations?
A baseline check happens in the first week. Meaningful citation patterns usually take 4 to 8 weeks to observe reliably, since answer engines do not refresh their sources constantly.
What do you need from us?
Your priority pages, the ones you most want cited for. Server logs or access, if you want us to check whether known AI crawlers are even reaching your site. That is a common and easily missed blocker.